D2 or Not D2? That is the Question
The short answer is Not D2.
There are two forms of vitamin D you can purchase as supplements, vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol, Drisdol the RX form of D) and D3 (cholecalciferol, no RX version paid for by insurance).
D2 comes from plants. D3 is made by mammals from cholesterol with the assistance of UVB radiation and heat. The biological half life of D2 in humans has been determined to be about 3-5 days with complete elimination occuring in 1-2 weeks. The biological half life of D3 as determined by submarine mariners is about 10 weeks. There has been no studies looking at how long it takes to deplete a human to zero D3, although I have seen such patients. The decay of vitamin D or conversion to an inactive form is not a linear process so vitamin D does not follow normal pharmacokinetics.
Normal pharmacokinetics state that in 4 half-lives you reach steady state at a given dose or you reach near complete elimination in the absence of drug. Vitamin D2 would have to be dosed about every 3 days for there to be any sort of steady state because of its very short half life in humans. This is why patients replaced with vitamin D2 once a week or less frequently see variable increases in their vitamin D levels. In general weekly or monthly dosing of D2 will not produce significant rises in vitamin D levels or vitamin D effect. A recent meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D on bone confirms the inefficacy of vitamin D as it is commonly prescribed. Vitamin D2 to be effective must be dosed about every 3 days. Unfortuanately, there is only one dose of D2 readily available and that is 50,000 IU. That is like trying to do eye surgery with a screw driver and hammer. It is the wrong tool for the job.
Vitamin D3 replacement at a given dose will reach steady state in 10 weeks the same as its half-life in submariners. The long half life of vitamin D3 allows for missed doses without a tremendous drop in blood level. It allows for make up doses and weekly or monthly dosing while still maintaining a steady blood level. Moreover, vitamin D3 is available over the counter at very low cost. Carlson Labs is a reputable manufacturer in business since the mid 1970s. A year’s supply of vitamin D3 gel caps by Carlson Labs costs about 25 dollars. The copay for a Drisdol (D2) prescription is likely to be as much for every month’s supply. You can get Carlson Labs vitamin D at many online retailers for very low cost including shipping.
So we have reviewed, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, convenience, and cost all coming down on the side of D3. The final issue is blood testing. Vitamin D2 is only reliably detectable by two current methods of measurement, HPLC dual mass spec and the Diasorin immunoassay. Mayo Clinic performs the mass spec technique with reliable precision but the prescision and reliability of other labs performing this technique is variable. (see my blog Vitamin D Testing Errors Continue) If you test your blood using a method that does not reliably detect D2 and your are taking D2, then you are not going to see a rise in your D level and this could be dangerous. LabCorp uses the Diasorin method to measure vitamin D capturing both D2 and D3 as a single total value. If you are not taking vitamin D2 then there is no concern over the D2 measurement issue only the accuracy of testing.
I hope this clears up all the confusion about D2 and D3. Happy supplementation.
Tags: Brain, cholecalciferol, Cost, Diasorin, Drisdol, Energy, ergocalciferol, LabCorp, National Library of Medicine, Nutrition, Pain, Quest, Sunlight, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Cure, Vitamin D Diet, Vitamin D2, Vitamin D3

June 11th, 2009 at 6:18 am
My doctor recently tested my Vit. D levels and found they were low. She prescribed D(2) at 50,000 IU weekly for 4 months. After hearing an excellent interview with you on our local radio station, I just purchased your book. I ordered Vit. D(3) from Carlson Labs. I have started the D(3) supplementation. According to your chart I am taking 5,000 IU daily.
My question is this…is it okay to NOT take the prescription D(2)? Or should I take it short-term to boost levels and then continue on the D(3)?
Thank you immensely.
July 3rd, 2009 at 12:38 am
Have just started reading the book, which so far is excellent. My current vitamin d3 intake has been 2000iu which seems to have improved my blood sugar levels .I reversed my type 2 diabetes three years ago after fourteen years of injecting insulin and have been completely free from any diabetic medication. My goal is to explore all possibilities of reducing arterial plaque and hoping this book is the answer.
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:57 am
I have a friend who is on Drisdol and is an ethical vegetarian. My question is how is VD3 obtained? If this means death for the animal is there a vegan source of V3?
January 14th, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Trish, D2 is equally effective as D3. However, D2 is vegan and D3 is not. There is no vegan source of D3 as it comes from lanolin or fish.
May 18th, 2010 at 7:51 am
I understand the article but, being a strict vegan who will probably never take D3, I would rather hear about the similarities in vitamin D2 and D3 rather than the differences. From what it sounds like, other than cost, convenience and frequency of use — all minor things for a vegan — I didn’t see a real difference relating to its effects on the body.
Can you please answer the question as to whether D2 and D3 have the same benefits to the body? (In whatever equivalent dose/frequency is necessary.)
August 12th, 2010 at 5:44 pm
vitamin d2 is only reliably detectable by two current methods of measurements hplc dual mass spec and he diasorin immunoassay mayo clinc performs the mass spec tecnique with performing this tecnique is varible. if you test your blood using a method that does not reliably detect d2 and your are taking d2 than you are not going to see a rise